Article, Started reading inferno, Where is ur sense brown?

Does DAN BROWN lack Aesthetic sense ? or BROWN’S work is a mistake?

Vivid reader’s of his book may be irked by the title of this post. But I have no other go rather than specifying something about  his work. Of course, his books were a real entertainer, i cannot blame it, but the facts written by him, should be searched for the second thought, because sometimes there is a situation were the author can easily “insult the intelligence of the readers”. As we have no idea on the subject, for this one, Dan Brown sets a perfect example.

In the book LOST SYMBOL:

   I cannot entirely blame the book, rather i cannot say that the book is not a nice one, because it provided a perfect entertainment, i read about nearly 90 pages in the book or so. But what pulled me here is the fact that the described about the origin of TATOO while describing the villian of the book, named “mak-hara” or something funny name, But the fact is he said that the TATOO was the symbol which was given as punishment for the criminals, and they were origin in mid eastern peninsula.

But actually it’s entirely different, the tatoo’s are origined in the Mexico region, as the MAYAN’s origin, where they used tatoo as the symbol for those who came from experiencing a big punishment usually from the jail. The person who came out from the jail was inscribed by tatoo, so that the people may know that the person was now became sober. Sober here refers that the person should have vowed that he won’t do the mistake again. In order to remain him that he was vowed people make tatoo on their skin.
In this plot, we have to make sure that, no one will be reading the origin of tatoo even after reading the book in such cases i think the author insults the intelligence of the reader. Ok that’s not so bad, Here in this new sequel of ROBERT LANGDON character described by Dan brown, in the book INFERNO  we can notice it.

INFERNO:
every one knows about MICHELANGELO
Ok do we know anything about the other person’s such as DONATELLO or do we hear about VERROCHHIO ?. the answer is definitely NO.  Because, we won’t read if there is someone that we haven’t heard off.

Specifically, Langdon describes about “FLORENCE” city as the birth place of MICHELANGELO oh of course it was, also he speaks more about the DAVID sculputre that it’s leaned right side and bearing no weight on his left side of the stone.
Now, the problem comes actually NUDITY is an art according to the people of italy, but the problem is it is not only michelangelo who has made the DAVID stone also the persons described above as, DONATELLO and VERROCHHIO also made david pictures.

Now shown by the side is the face  view of “DAVID” done by Michelangelo. The art was fine as protrayed by the author. But seems something more missing while comparing the works of others.

Now this is the back view of the david picture which is well presented by  

michelangelo. It lacks the history dosen’t it?..because DAVID is someone who became so famous for killing a giant in a country and married a princess and became a prince .. all happened in a some historic place, but its a truth some people say, truth or myth but that dosen’t matter now where is the”head of the giant?”

Now here is the full picture in all vies views are not the only thing matters what matter is the content that what dan brown also missed in his book. David created by michelangelo is a flaw, a historic mistake..what so nice to speak about a mistake well take the look at the other sculptures created by the people.

HERE IS ONE FOR U. Now this is the david (bronze) created by VERROCHHIO was a bronze work but u see the history is place here, beneath the david sclupture is what the presence of the “GIANT HEAD“. this is the apt work. But VERROCHHIO never believed in nuditiy he saw its always obscene to present something in the nude manner.

take another david look The david shown below was done by DONATELLO  unlike verrochhio donatello believed in nudity, but he figured the flw in the work of michelangelo, but he admired the bronze work of verrachhio.

So what he did is combined the work of both veracchio and michelangelo, also to be taken in fact that donatello was born in FLORENCE just like michelangelo did, speaking about the bad happening of the history is awfully bad. So donatello did a white pastery work as shown in the picture below to show his passion for the work of michelangelo.  but he added the image of the GIANT’S head in addition, as it is  a flaw did by michelangelo. according to me. it was donatello who needs to be appreciated than michelangelo. Brown really made a mistake on the mistake art

Leave a Comment